Hi there. I’m Jessie Szymanski, the newest guest contributor for the iShares Blog.
My job is all about making your life easier. I mean, I won’t do your laundry, but my role at iShares is to make your investments easier to understand and easier to implement. As a Messaging and Communications Strategist, I write about anything from new products to investment strategies to the essentials of fixed income ETFs.
So I thought I’d take my mission of making your life easier to the (blog) streets, starting with a topic we’ve been hearing a lot about lately: preferred stock.
Preferreds are attracting a lot of attention now for two reasons. First, a persistently low interest rate environment has pushed many investors to seek yield in places other than fixed income. Preferreds are subordinate to bonds, but senior to common stock. That means that they generally offer higher yields than bonds, but less return potential than common stock. They’re often referred to as “hybrid” securities because they offer some characteristics of bonds and some characteristics of common stocks.
The second reason for the recent focus on preferreds is that a provision of the Dodd-Frank Act may affect the way that US banks classify their preferred offerings. (The majority of preferred securities are issued by financial companies.) So investors who traditionally look to the United States for preferreds have started to look internationally.
What’s interesting about the international preferred market is that it’s dominated by Canada. Fully 73% of the iShares S&P International Preferred Stock Index Fund (IPFF) is dedicated to Canadian securities.
Why is that important? Three reasons:
- Canadian banks are strong. Some investors shy away from US preferreds because they’re typically issued by financial companies (and are then linked to sometimes-shaky US banks). According to a recent World Economic Forum study on 150+ countries, Canada’s banking system was the most sound of them all (the United States ranked #111). While the United States relaxed underwriting standards a few years back, Canada did not, so Canadian bank balances sheets are seen as stronger.
- Investors can diversify internationally, without those pesky PIIGS. You might be worried about a little something called the continent of Europe. While IPFF has exposure to the UK and Sweden, it’s dominated by Canada and has no exposure to the PIIGS (Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece, and Spain), Germany or France. The result? Investors can use IPFF to diversify internationally, without undue exposure to the most problematic European countries.
- Potential for additional income versus common stock. Because IPFF consists of preferred stock, it offers the potential for additional income versus Canadian common stock (but lower return potential). For investors who prioritize income, the difference in yield (5.36% for IPFF’s index as of May 31 versus 3.11% for broad Canadian common stock, as measured by the MSCI Canada Index) may be worth a closer look.
Income-seeking investors can consider IPFF an interesting alternative to common stocks, or a natural complement to traditional preferred stock investments.
How else can I make your life easier? What investment-related concerns are keeping you up at night? Comment below and I’ll answer your other questions.
Now if I could only get someone to do my laundry….


Hi Jessie,
I wonder if you could elaborate on 2 things. Why is preferred stock dominated by financial institutions (both in the US and apparently in Canada)?
And could you go into detail about what Dodd-Frank’s effect on preferred stock will be?
Best,
Ravi Prakriya
Hi Ravi — thanks for your questions. To answer your first question, financial institutions generally issue more preferred securities because they are required to maintain sufficient “Tier 1″ capital. Tier 1 capital is the core measure of a bank’s financial strength from a regulator’s point of view, and can take the form of common stock, retained earnings, or preferred stock.
Under an amendment to the Dodd-Frank Act, trust preferred securities will no longer count toward a bank’s Tier 1 capital. The rule will begin to phase in on January 2013, over a 3-year period. While some investors are concerned that the rule change will deplete the supply of preferreds, it’s important to remember that: 1) the rule change is directed at trust preferred securities (not the entire asset class); and 2) after the change goes into effect, financial companies may still continue to issue trust preferreds (they just won’t count toward Tier 1 capital requirements). Because preferreds still remain an attractive source of financing, financial companies have continued to (and are expected to continue to) issue preferreds.
Thanks for your questions – keep them coming!
Jessie